Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Two years ago, on June 14, 2019, New York lawmakers approved, and Governor Cuomo signed into law, the "Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019" (the Act), which contained a series of laws affecting all rentals within the State of New York. The Act was intended to provide safeguards and additional protections to tenants in rental properties. As we had previously predicted, among its many sweeping changes, the Act had an unintended and profound impact on the thousands of cooperative corporations located in New York. Boards of directors and their managing agents were also forced to deal with the uncertainty of many of the Act's provisions, often erring on the side of inaction. However, on June 10, 2021, New York's lawmakers approved amendments to the Act, exempting cooperative corporations from some of the most onerous provisions, and clarifying others. Once the new legislation is signed into law by the Governor, it will not only be a huge victory for the thousands of cooperative apartment buildings but also for many potential purchasers who were unable to purchase in those buildings as a result of the Act.
Cooperative corporations, unlike condominiums, rely on a landlord-tenant relationship under a proprietary lease (which governs the occupancy of the apartment). As a result, boards of directors are considered landlords and purchaser-shareholders are considered tenants, though, in each case, not in the traditional sense. Cooperative corporations are also not set up as a for-profit business, rather they are private housing corporations intended generally for occupancy by its shareholders and are governed by a proprietary lease and by-laws which sets forth the rights of each party and terms of governance.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.