Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Authority to File Chapter 11: A Matter of Contract or Public Policy?
If you think public policy favoring the freedom to file a Chapter 11 trumps the freedom to negotiate specific restrictions to such a filing, think again. On July 22, 2021, Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey dismissed the Chapter 11 case of 3P Hightstown, LLC, finding that the debtor lacked the proper authority to commence its Chapter 11 due to its failure to comply with its LLC agreement. Unwilling to follow Judge Walrath's approach in a COVID-related Delaware Chapter 11 case, Judge Kaplan concluded that the governing LLC agreement — which contained a provision restricting the debtor's ability to commence a bankruptcy case — was not void as contrary to public policy. In making its determination, the court provided analysis that is helpful and instructive to anyone considering filing a bankruptcy petition for an LLC, particularly where the LLC is organized under Delaware law. This article explores Judge Kaplan's analysis and the basis for his opinion.
Background
On April 9, 2021, 3P Hightstown, LLC filed a voluntary chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. Shortly thereafter, Hightstown Enterprises LLC, an entity claiming to be the preferred member of the debtor via an assignment, filed a motion seeking dismissal of the debtor's bankruptcy case. Specifically, Hightstown Enterprises asserted that, pursuant to the debtor's Limited Liability Company Agreement, the debtor lacked authority to file a bankruptcy petition absent certain prerequisites which had not occurred. The debtor opposed the motion.
Debtor's Authority to File
The United States Supreme Court, in Price v. Gurney, 324 U.S. 100, 104 (1945), noted that, with respect to corporations, the entity vested with "the power of management" has the authority necessary to file a bankruptcy petition. If an entity without the "power of management" files a bankruptcy petition, the bankruptcy case must be dismissed. This principle also applies to cases filed by limited liability companies.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.