Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Second Circuit Expands Federal Class Actions for Mortgagors

By By Jonathan Robbin
September 01, 2021

In Maddox v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A., 997 F.3d 436, the Second Circuit recently held that individuals have Article III standing to seek statutory damages for a bank's violation of Real Property Law (RPL) §275 and New Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (RPAPL) §1921 (together, New York's Mortgage-Satisfaction-Recording Statutes). The Second Circuit held that, despite no "actual injury," violations of New York statutory law constitute a concrete and particularized harm giving rise to Article III standing. This is important because under New York rules, a plaintiff could not bring a class action in state court under New York's Mortgage-Satisfaction-Recording Statutes. Because the Second Circuit held that a bare violation of New York's Mortgage-Satisfaction-Recording Statutes without a demonstration of actual injury conferred federal jurisdiction, a mortgagor now has the ability to bring a class action in federal court. Thus, statutes designed to be merely remedial in nature can now be used punitively against lenders and servicers.

The Plaintiffs, Sandra Maddox and Tometta Maddox Holley, obtained a loan with Aegis Mortgage Corporation, which was memorialized by a mortgage secured against a property located in Buffalo, New York. The mortgage was, thereafter, assigned to Bank of New York Mellon (BNY). On or about Oct. 5, 2014, the loan was paid off and the debt discharged. BNY filed a satisfaction of mortgage on Sept. 22, 2015.

New York's mortgage-satisfaction-recording statutes require a mortgage lender to file a certificate of discharge/satisfaction of mortgage within thirty (30) days of full repayment of the debt. Failure to present a certificate of discharge within certain time frames results in the mortgagee being liable to the mortgagor in monetary form. Specifically, RPL §275 and RPAPL §1921 both mandate that a mortgagee present a satisfaction of mortgage/certificate of discharge to the Clerk's Office within 30 days of the payment of the debt and: 1) if not filed within 30 days, the mortgagee shall be liable to the mortgagor in the amount of $500.00; 2) if not filed within 60 days, the mortgagee shall be liable to the mortgagor in the amount of $1,000.00; 3) if not filed within 90 days, the mortgagee shall be liable to the mortgagor in the amount of $1,500.00.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Top 5 Strategies for Managing the End-of-Year Collections Frenzy Image

End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.

The Self-Service Buyer Is On the Rise Image

Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.

Should Large Law Firms Penalize RTO Rebels or Explore Alternatives? Image

Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.

Sink or Swim: The Evolving State of Law Firm Administrative Support Image

The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?

Tax Treatment of Judgments and Settlements Image

Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.