Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sticks and stones may break bones, but defamatory words on the Internet can break a brand.
Gone are the days when rude remarks muttered around water coolers or posted in local papers have their moment and then quickly fade from the public's memory with little to no lasting impact. Today, thanks to the Internet, disgruntled customers, scorned relationship partners and business rivals have unprecedented power to significantly affect a brand or celebrity's reputation with damaging comments on public review sites, blasts on social media, or articles that go viral when picked up by a wider news network and distributed for all to see.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.