Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In 2018 and 2019, ModernaTx, Inc. (Moderna) filed a pair of inter partes review petitions challenging the validity of two patents generally directed to RNA technology owned by Arbutus Biopharma Corp. (Arbutus). The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) held that certain challenged claims of each patent were not unpatentable. On Dec. 1, 2021, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Lourie, O'Malley, and Stoll issued two opinions, each authored by Judge Lourie and captioned ModernaTx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corp., Nos. 2020-1184, -1186 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 1, 2021) (Moderna I) and No. 2020-2329 (Moderna II), holding that Moderna had standing to appeal only one of the two adverse decisions by the PTAB and otherwise affirming the PTAB's findings on appeal and cross-appeal.
The cases concern two related patents — U.S. Patent Nos. 8,058,069 (the '069 patent) and 9,364,435 (the '435 patent) — that are each entitled "lipid formulations for nucleic acid delivery" and are generally directed to "stable nucleic acid-lipid particles (SNALP) comprising a nucleic acid (such as one or more interfering RNA), methods of making the SNALP, and methods of delivering and/or administering the SNALP." '069 patent, Abstract.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.