Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistFeaturesCopyrightsIntellectual PropertyLitigationTechnology Media and Telecom

Ninth Circuit Finally Resolves Pre-1972 Sound Recordings Royalties Issue

By Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. Bernstein
January 01, 2022

In the opening paragraph of Flo & Eddie v. Sirius XM Radio, No. 17-55844, decided Aug. 23, 2021, the Ninth Circuit aptly described the "patchwork quilt of federal and state copyright laws" governing pre-1972 sound recordings as a "ball of confusion," borrowing the title of a classic 1970 Temptations record. (The remainder of the Ninth Circuit's opinion incorporates the titles of many other pre-1972 recordings into its analysis, all shown in boldface type in the discussion that follows.) The opinion resolves an eight-year, multi-Circuit class action brought by owners of pre-1972 recordings (collectively, Flo & Eddie) against satellite radio provider Sirius XM, with plaintiffs asserting — ultimately without success — a right to be paid royalties for defendant's past digital transmissions of their pre-1972 recordings.

At the time the action was commenced in 2013, such older recordings were protected only by state law, not by the federal Copyright Act. Thus the federal statutory royalty enacted for digital performances of sound recordings in 1995, under §11, did not benefit pre-1972 recordings, which (coincidentally?) are among the most valuable hit recordings of all time. A subsequent statute, the so-called CLASSICS Act, passed in 2018 as the Flo & Eddie litigation was well underway, provides a federal digital performance royalty for pre-1972 recordings, just as plaintiffs sought to do under state law, and also preempts previously-filed claims under the state laws under which plaintiffs were suing. But for reasons perhaps unique to this case, the CLASSICS Act did not resolve or preempt the parties' dispute, which remained subject to state law. A ball of confusion indeed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.