Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bankruptcy Court Gives Pre-Petition Antitrust Claims Administrative Priority Status
As we ring in the New Year, we hope for a "fresh start" out of the pandemic, but recognize that challenges remain, including the latest variant. In the restructuring bar, we see new approaches being attempted to address old problems. And courts continue to be asked to adjudicate these matters. One of the hottest areas of law practice today is antitrust. So today we decided to report on a decision issued by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge John T. Dorsey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware in In re Mallinckrodt, Case No. 20-12522 (JTD), where the court was asked to decide whether claims arising from pre-petition antitrust cases filed against the debtor could constitute post-petition claims entitled to administrative priority status. In a decision issued on Oct. 19, 2021, the court ruled they could, and the public policy that favors a "fresh start" for debtors would not preclude damages from post-petition sales of products in violation of federal antitrust laws from receiving administrative expense priority.
The Debtors Allegedly Unlawful Skyrocketing Product Pricing
The opinion recites that Mallinckrodt PLC and its affiliated Chapter 11 debtors (the debtors) operate a global pharmaceutical company. The opinion notes that in addition to less controversial drugs, the debtors produced and sold opioids, and had been named in over 3,000 opioid-related lawsuits asserting claims the debtors overstated the benefits of opioids while understating their risks and marketed the drugs in a manner that contributed to the national opioid addition crisis in the United States. Defending the lawsuits had become cost prohibitive, contributing in large part to the debtors' need to reorganize.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.