Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A new antitrust complaint over ticketing fees has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Live Nation Entertainment Inc. and Ticketmaster. Heckman v. Live Nation Entertainment Inc., 2:22-cv-00047 (Complaint available at //bit.ly/3FLZjlC). The plaintiffs' tandem had been pursuing antitrust claims against the world's largest concert promoter and the ticket-selling giant in a lawsuit originally filed in 2020 on behalf of ticket-buyers who claim they paid artificially inflated fees on Ticketmaster's online platforms for concerts at major venues. Central Federal District Judge George H. Wu, dismissing that first suit, granted a request from Ticketmaster's lawyers at Latham & Watkins to route the ticket-buyers' claims to arbitration last September. Oberstein v. Live Nation Entertainment Inc., 2:20-cv-03888. The judge found Ticketmaster adequately put consumers on notice that all disputes would be routed to arbitration in its terms of use.
But in the Heckman complaint, the plaintiffs' lawyers at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and the Chicago-based Keller Lenkner noted that while the companies' motion to compel arbitration was pending last summer, Ticketmaster changed its ticket-purchase terms of use. As of July 2, rather than routing arbitrations to established alternative-dispute-resolution (ADR) provider JAMS, Ticketmaster designated New Era ADR, an online startup based in Chicago, as the forum for disputes with consumers. The plaintiffs in the newly filed suit put forth the same antitrust claims as in the Oberstein suit, while challenging the consumer arbitration agreement by claiming New Era ADR's protocols for mass arbitrations, laid out in the rules and procedures posted to its website, require "a novel and one-sided process that is tailored to disadvantage consumers."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.