Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is impossible to predict whether supply chain disruptions caused by the COVID pandemic, increased interest rates, market volatility, changes in workforce trends, inflationary pressures, and geopolitical upheaval will lead to a recession and wave of bankruptcies. Regardless, certain sectors and businesses undoubtedly will experience distress, and doing business with distressed customers always brings the risk of nonpayment.
But there is another risk that can be even more frustrating. One of the basic policies of bankruptcy law is that creditors who receive payments on antecedent debts as the debtor slides into bankruptcy may have those payments recovered by the bankruptcy estate as a preference. In the face of this risk, suppliers have taken comfort knowing the Bankruptcy Code protects regular, ordinary commercial transactions between distressed companies and vendors willing to continue the relationship. But what is ordinary? For decades, courts have wrestled with this question. And it can involve significant sums. In a recent decision of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana in the Chapter 11 case In re HHGregg, (Adv. No. 17-50282), a supplier whose invoices were paid consistent with payment terms was nevertheless held liable for $3,517,805.06 plus prejudgment interest as a preference.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.