Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Recent developments suggest that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) will continue to pursue extraterritorial criminal cases in connection with the government's broader programmatic goals. For example, as the private sector works to implement sanctions recently imposed in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, prosecutors will likely seek to investigate violations of those measures and efforts to evade them by foreign actors, including in the cybersecurity and cryptocurrency spaces. Foreign targets are also likely part of the "robust pipeline" of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) cases referenced by senior DOJ official Nicholas McQuaid in January 2022. As DOJ looks abroad to support the Biden Administration's national security and criminal justice objectives, the defense bar will continue to be called upon to advise foreign clients, with assistance from local counsel, on risks related to arrest and extradition (as well as the substance of the investigations). This article addresses some issues to consider, including foreign arrest procedures, contesting extradition, and engaging with prosecutors before a defendant arrives in the United States.
DOJ initiates many foreign arrests by seeking provisional arrest warrants through INTERPOL or diplomatic channels, and then pursuing extraditions pursuant to existing treaties after the defendant is in foreign custody. Nevertheless, lawyers evaluating the possibility of foreign arrest in connection with a U.S. prosecution should be sensitive to the fact that DOJ can coordinate arrests in countries where there is no bilateral treaty. In June 2020, DOJ secured the arrest of Venezuelan national Alex Saab in Cabo Verde despite the absence of such an agreement. The United States relied principally on the U.N. Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime. After extensive litigation, Cabo Verde transferred Saab to the United States to face international money laundering charges.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.