Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Seventh Circuit Bars Bad Faith Asset Buyer Protection
"Good-faith purchasers enjoy strong protection under [Bankruptcy Code ("Code")] §363(m)," but the silent asset buyer ("B") with "actual and constructive knowledge of a competing interest" lacks "good faith," held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on April 4, 2022. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. ("ADM") v. Country Visions Cooperative, 2022 WL 998984 (7th Cir. Apr. 4, 2022). Affirming the lower courts' denial of B's motion to enforce a "free-and-clear sale" provision in a plan confirmation order, the Seventh Circuit cited the bad faith of both the debtors and B, the asset purchaser.
Relevance and Context
Bankruptcy court-approved asset sales are common. To encourage its participation in bankruptcy sales, Code §363(m) provides that a purchaser of a debtor's assets will be protected from reversal of the sale on appeal so long as the purchaser acted in "good faith." But the Code does not define "good faith" purchaser. See, In re Gucci, 126 F.3d 380, 390 (2d Cir. 1997). According to the traditional equitable definition, a good faith purchaser is "one who purchases the assets for value, in good faith and without notice of adverse claims." Id., quoting Willemain v. Kivitz, 764 F.2d 1019, 1023 (4th Cir. 1985). A buyer's good faith is evidenced "by the integrity of [its] conduct during the course of the sale proceedings." Id. In Gucci, a fiercely litigious competitor of the Chapter 11 debtor bought the debtor's assets (trademark and licensing rights). The court held the buyer to be a "good faith" purchaser under Code §363(m), explaining how the "good faith" principle applied to asset sales.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.