Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
"Good-faith purchasers enjoy strong protection under [Bankruptcy Code ("Code")] §363(m)," but the silent asset buyer ("B") with "actual and constructive knowledge of a competing interest" lacks "good faith," held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on April 4, 2022. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. ("ADM") v. Country Visions Cooperative, 2022 WL 998984 (7th Cir. Apr. 4, 2022). Affirming the lower courts' denial of B's motion to enforce a "free-and-clear sale" provision in a plan confirmation order, the Seventh Circuit cited the bad faith of both the debtors and B, the asset purchaser.
Bankruptcy court-approved asset sales are common. To encourage its participation in bankruptcy sales, Code §363(m) provides that a purchaser of a debtor's assets will be protected from reversal of the sale on appeal so long as the purchaser acted in "good faith." But the Code does not define "good faith" purchaser. See, In re Gucci, 126 F.3d 380, 390 (2d Cir. 1997). According to the traditional equitable definition, a good faith purchaser is "one who purchases the assets for value, in good faith and without notice of adverse claims." Id., quoting Willemain v. Kivitz, 764 F.2d 1019, 1023 (4th Cir. 1985). A buyer's good faith is evidenced "by the integrity of [its] conduct during the course of the sale proceedings." Id. In Gucci, a fiercely litigious competitor of the Chapter 11 debtor bought the debtor's assets (trademark and licensing rights). The court held the buyer to be a "good faith" purchaser under Code §363(m), explaining how the "good faith" principle applied to asset sales.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.