Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Countless organizations have devoted considerable amounts of resources and time building cybersecurity defenses in the last decade. However, efforts to build secure supply chain networks have only begun in recent years. Indeed, it was not until the April 2021 compromise of SolarWinds software that led to a swath of intrusions across government entities and various industries that attacks on supply chain networks became a common concern within the C-Suite. The heightened threat to distribution networks compelled attorneys, among other professionals, to rethink how best to protect existing infrastructure and allocate risks. This article details the anatomy of a supply chain cyberattack, explores the existing state of supply chain protective contractual terms, and proposes actionable steps with a collective approach to guide legal professionals through their precarious endeavors.
|Unlike typical cyberattacks, a supply chain infiltration requires more sophistication and patience than a script kiddie, phishing scam, or brute force attack. However, while it is still possible that a supply chain cyberattack may commence as a typical phishing scam, the sophistication of a supply chain infiltration comes into play after the initial intrusion. To successfully execute this type of attack, the actor must remain undetected in the organization's technology infrastructure and move across different software to access the systems where the victim's data or code resides. The level of sophistication required to stay hidden, combined with the prolonged waiting periods while surveying the systems and devising a compromise plan, leads to the inevitable conclusion that a nation-state actor often conducts such attacks.
An actor's restraint from arising suspicion while persistently accessing a vendor's software product over an extended period has its rewards. Disguised as legitimate software traffic, the actor gains entry to prospective victims' systems running the impacted version of the compromised product. The actor has now infiltrated a new host organization by leveraging the initial compromise, potentially leading to additional victims. And the value of this technique is not sheer volume. It essentially converts legitimate software into an unintended Trojan Horse by which the actor bypasses well-designed security protocols. In the case of SolarWinds, it was cybersecurity firm FireEye's investigation of its compromise that identified the backdoor built into SolarWinds' product. Here, the biggest challenge for the attacker is not the sophistication of the security defenses but the length of time before the compromise is widely detected. It is also worth noting that victims using the compromised software who do not sustain significant breaches likely evaded such fate simply because the attacker had prioritized other targets.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.