Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
You have probably heard countless stories about how the pandemic has forever changed the legal sector. From remote and hybrid working environments to desperately needed technology and security upgrades, things are undoubtedly different. One of the shifts with the most impact in the marketplace involves the way client expectations have drastically changed.
Client expectations have been changing for some time; however, like many things, the change accelerated over the last two years. In fact, Talkdesk reports that most customers have higher expectations than before the pandemic. Perhaps the intersection of the pandemic with the rise of digital natives as decisionmakers created the perfect recipe for increased client expectations. The shift could also be a result of clients becoming increasingly comfortable with digital technologies and self-service options in a remote world.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.