Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, denied a motion to compel arbitration of a copyright infringement lawsuit over rights to the reality TV program Cheaters Uncensored. Bobby Goldstein Productions Inc. (BGP) v. Habeeb, 3:21-CV-1924. Bobby Goldstein created the TV show Cheaters and formed the production company BGP. Tommy Habeeb, who Goldstein collaborated with, later sued Goldstein himself in Texas state court over ownership rights to Cheaters. A 2005 settlement of the suit gave Habeeb "the exclusive right to approach potential pay-per-view and premium channel outlets and negotiate the terms of any agreement to broadcast Cheaters Uncensored" but deemed Goldstein "owner of all copyright in any and all footage of Cheaters that will be the basis for Cheaters Uncensored and will own the copyright in all episodes of Cheaters Uncensored." In 2021, BGP sued Habeeb, alleging Habeeb didn't have a "license to make copies of the Episodes on the Internet or to make the Episodes and/or derivative works thereof available for performance or display by the public on the Internet." Habeeb moved for arbitration of the copyright dispute under the 2005 settlement. First, Senior Northern District Judge A. Joe Fish agreed with BGP that the settlement agreement "resolved a lawsuit between Mr. Habeeb and Mr. Goldstein. BGP was neither a party to the lawsuit nor a signatory to the settlement agreement; indeed, the terms of the settlement agreement do not even mention BGP, and there is no evidence that the parties intended the settlement agreement to apply to BGP." And even if it did, Senior District Judge Fish found: "The court agrees with BGP that the '[d]efendants make no attempt to provide any argument — much less evidence — to demonstrate that their infringing internet-based copyright violations relate to negotiations with any pay-per-view or premium channel outlet."
*****
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.