Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bankruptcy Litigation Tax

Stipulation That Resolves Entire Amount Must Reflect Intent of Parties

The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed a lower courts’ rulings that a stipulation between the IRS and a bankruptcy trustee, which allowed the IRS’s priority tax claim, did not prevent the IRS from collecting nondischargeable tax debt above the agreed amount in that stipulation.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

It arguably goes without saying that when entering into a stipulation or any settlement in a bankruptcy proceeding that purports to resolve the entire amount and treatment of a claim, the terms of such agreement must fully and clearly reflect the intent of the parties. This is particularly true in connection with nondischargeable priority tax claims, as demonstrated in a recent U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision. See, Minor v. United States (In re Minor), No. 21-55360 (9th Cir. Apr. 18, 2022). In Minor, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower courts’ rulings that a stipulation between the IRS and a bankruptcy trustee, which allowed the IRS’s priority tax claim, did not prevent the IRS from collecting nondischargeable tax debt above the agreed amount in that stipulation.

This premium content is locked for The Bankruptcy Strategist subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR BANKRUPTCY LAW PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • All aspects of bankruptcy law are covered
  • Tap into expert guidance from top bankruptcy lawyers

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next