Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Copyrights Entertainment and Sports Law

'To Kill a Mockingbird'’s State Adaptation Rights Results In Ambiguity Battle

A current dispute over contract language in grants to different parties for theatrical adaptations of the classic 1960 novel "To Kill a Mockingbird" is an apt example of what can happen if contract language isn’t specific enough.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

If more than one derivative-use agreement is entered into for the exploitation of rights in the underlying work, a key goal of contract drafters and negotiators is to specify and distinguish the rights being granted to each of the different parties in their agreements. A major consideration, of course, is to avoid disputes from an overlap of rights granted. A current dispute over contract language in grants to different parties for theatrical adaptations of the classic 1960 novel To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is an apt example of what can happen if contract language isn’t specific enough, in this case resulting in an arbitrator inserting the term “non-first-class rights” into an award decision and leading Lee’s estate to claim the arbitrator’s use of the term was ambiguous.

To continue reading,
become a free ALM digital reader

Benefits include:

*May exclude premium content

Read These Next