Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California decided that federal copyright law didn't preempt a claim by Marilyn Wilson Rutherford, the former wife of Beach Boys icon Brian Wilson, to a share — under a 1981 judgment dissolving her marriage with Brian — of his income from the December 2021 sale of his song rights to Universal Music Publishing Group (UMPG). Wilson v. Rutherford, 2:22-cv-01982. The 1981 divorce judgment, issued by the L.A. Superior Court's Family Law division, stipulated that 170 Beach Boys songs Brian wrote during the couple's marriage were marital community property. The judgment then gave Marilyn a 50% share of revenues the songs generated and Brian the exclusive right "to administer and exploit all rights" in the compositions. Brian sold the songs to UMPG after recapturing the copyrights under the assignment termination provisions of Sec. 304(c) of the U.S. Copyright Act. In February 2022, Marilyn filed a request in the family law court in part for an accounting and payment of at least $6.7 million from the song catalog sale. In March, Brian had the case removed to federal court. In an August 2022 ruling, Central District federal Judge Josephine L. Staton observed: "Brian argues that although the parties were married from 1964 to 1978, the Reverted [song] Rights he sold in the Community Works cannot be community property because pursuant to Section 304(c) [his] termination rights did not first vest until 2011." But remanding the case back to the L.A. Superior Court for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction, District Judge Station noted: "Marilyn does not assert that she has a right to terminate any grants of copyrights in the Community Works; nor does she dispute that Brian had the right to terminate the grants. Instead, Marilyn merely asserts that she is entitled to certain revenues arising from Brian's exploitation of the Community Works, as provided under the 1981 Judgment (or more broadly under California's family law)." The district judge added: "Indeed, Section 304(c) provides that '[t]ermination of a grant under this subsection affects only those rights covered by the grant that arise under this title, and in no way affects rights arising under' state law."
*****
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and Professor Emeritus of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado Denver. For more info: www.stansoocher.com.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
To gauge the level of risk and uncover potential gaps, compliance and privacy leaders should collaborate to consider how often they are monitoring third parties, what intelligence they are gathering with and about their partners and vendors, and whether their risk management practices have been diminished due to cost and resource constraints.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.