Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Part One of this series discussed the history of Canada's recently introduced Consumer Privacy Protection Act and reviewed the similarities with GDPR, such as data portability, the right not be forgotten, codes of practice, and a safe harbor provision. Part Two analyzed the new compliance requirement of valid consent. Part Three continues the analysis of new compliance requirements, including the content of organizational privacy policies and anonymization of personal information policies, and business transaction policies contained in the Act.
The federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) already requires that organizations make readily available to individuals information about its policies and practices relating to the management of personal information. However, the Act requires not only that this information be made available "in plain language" (see, Section 62(1) of the Act.), but also that the information now include (in addition to a description of the type of personal information under the organization's control, how an individual may make a request for disposal or access, and the business contact information of the individual to whom complaints or requests for information may be made — all of which are existing PIPEDA requirements) the following specific additional information: a) in addition to a general account of how the organization uses the personal information, an account as to how it applies the exceptions to the requirement to obtain an individual's consent, which must include a description of any activities in which it has a "legitimate interest" (see above); b) a general account of the organization's use of any automated decision system to make predictions, recommendations or decisions about individuals that could have a significant impact on them (see below); c) whether or not the organization carries out any international or interprovincial transfer or disclosure of personal information that may have "reasonably foreseeable privacy implications"; and d) the retention periods applicable to sensitive personal information. See, Section 62(2) of the Act.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.