Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Duty of Candor and Good Faith With the USPTO Covers Non-Inventors and Non-Practitioners
The Federal Circuit decision in Belcher Pharm. v. Hospira, Inc., 11 F.4th 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2021), confirms important details regarding the duty of candor and good faith when interacting with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). For example, withholding information that is material to the patentability of a pending claim of a patent application during prosecution can cause a resultant patent to be found unenforceable. In view of the Belcher decision, the USPTO released a Notice on July 29, 2022 that provides additional guidance on the duty of candor and good faith. Practitioners and non-practitioners that are associated with the examination of patents and patent applications should be vigilant about information that may be material to patentability to avoid having an issued patent be deemed unenforceable.
Federal Circuit Decision
The decision concerns Belcher's U.S. Patent No. 9,283,197, which discloses an injectable liquid formulation having a concentration of 1.0 – 1.06 mg/mL of L-epinephrine, a pH between 2.8 and 3.3, and certain specified percentages of degradation products. Id. at 1347–1350. The subject matter of the '197 patent also was submitted in a New Drug Application (NDA) to the Federal Drug Administration (FDA). Id. The information and arguments submitted to the FDA were different than the information and arguments presented to the USPTO. Based on this difference, the Federal Circuit determined that the '197 patent was unenforceable because Belcher engaged in inequitable conduct by intentionally and deceptively withholding material information from the USPTO during prosecution of the '197 patent, where such material information was disclosed to the FDA. Id. at 1354.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.