Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Legal Tech: Duty to Preserve ESI of Hybrid-Driven Collaborative Tools

By Kimbrilee M. Weber and Julien M. Baumrin
October 01, 2022

As the trend in remote and hybrid work has continued to grow in popularity, applications permitting real-time collaboration between employees plays an important role for businesses. With heightened ease of use and convenience, however, comes a duty for businesses and organizations to employ best practices regarding their responsibilities in maintaining the electronically stored information (ESI) that these applications create. Litigants must also remain mindful of evolving types of ESI when demanding information from opposing parties and non-parties to support their claims and defenses in litigation.

The Duty to Preserve

The duty to preserve arises where: "(1) there is pending or likely litigation and knowledge of this fact by the alleged spoliating party, (2) the evidence is relevant to litigation, and (3) the opposing party would be prejudiced by the destruction or disposal of the evidence." Cockerline v. Menendez, 411 N.J. Super. 596, 620 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 201 N.J. 499 (2010). Keep in mind that a party can be sanctioned for failing to preserve ESI regardless of whether the failure to preserve was negligent or intentional. Rosenblit v. Zimmerman, 166 N.J. 391, 401-02 (2001); Jerista v. Murray, 185 N.J. 175, 201 (2005).

This premium content is locked for Cybersecurity Law & Strategy subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.