Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The New York Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed a New York County Supreme Court decision that "plaintiff's losses resulting from the cancellation of its Broadway show during the COVID-19 pandemic did not fall within the communicable disease exclusion in the insurance policy." The appellate court found: "[G]iving the exclusion a strict and narrow construction, and resolving any ambiguities against defendant, we find that it precluded from coverage losses resulting from quarantine or travel advisory orders issued by a national or international body or agency in response to a communicable disease … As plaintiff's losses stemmed from Executive Orders issued by the New York State Governor and New York City Mayor banning performances and gatherings in theaters, the exclusion did not apply." Tina Turner Musical LLC v. Chubb Insurance Company of Europe, 16804 (2022).
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided that the Jersey Shore reality series spin-off MTV Floribama Shore didn't infringe on the trademark for the plaintiffs' "Flora-Bama Lounge, Package and Oyster Bar" long located on the Florida-Alabama border. MGFB Properties Inc. v. Viacom Inc., 21-13458 (2022). Analyzing the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. §1051 et seq.) issue under Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989), the Eleventh Circuit noted: "The relationship between the series title and the series content itself is well above the artistic relevance threshold. 'Floribama' describes the subculture profiled in the series and the geographic area exemplified by the subculture." The appeals court added: "Here, there is no evidence Defendants held the series out as endorsed or sponsored by Plaintiffs, nor did they explicitly state that the series was affiliated with Plaintiffs. To the contrary, Viacom chose a title that includes its own house mark (MTV) and the name of one of its iconic franchises (Shore).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.