Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Mosaic Brands, Inc. v. Ridge Wallet LLC, 55 F.4th 1354, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2022), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded a judgment from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Mosaic Brands, Inc (Mosaic) sued Ridge Wallet, LLC (Ridge) for trade dress infringement under the Lanham Act. In addition, both Mosaic and Ridge accused the other of patent infringement. Mosaic asserted that Ridge infringed U.S. Patent No. 7,334,616 ('616 patent) and Ridge asserted that Mosaic infringed U.S. Patent No. 10,791,808 ('808 patent). Mosaic and Ridge both make similar money-clip wallets. The District Court granted Mosaic's motion for summary judgment and held that Ridge's patent was invalid. Additionally, the District Court granted summary judgement to Ridge on Mosaic's trade dress claim. Mosaic appealed the claim construction of the terms "lip" and "of varying thickness" for the '616 patent along with the summary judgment ruling against its trade dress claim. Ridge appealed the summary judgment holding as to its '808 patent.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."