Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a lawsuit by filmmaker Joshua Newton against Ron Meyer, former Vice Chairman of NBCUniversal Media (NBCU). Newton v. Meyer (22 Civ. 540). Newton alleged Meyer acted as his agent to help Newton find funding interest in two of Newton's scripts, including "Nicole & O.J." But according to the court: "All the while, Meyer was allegedly hiding inappropriate relationships that he and other Hollywood executives had with an actress who was the anticipated star of Newton's ['Nicole & O.J.'] After details of those relationships became public, all investor interest in 'Nicole & O.J.' vanished, and the film remains unmade to this day." Newton sued Meyer alleging breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation. Dismissing Newton's complaint with prejudice, Southern District Judge John P. Cronan concluded: "Newton fails to adequately allege the formation of a fiduciary relationship, that any of Meyer's statements were false or materially misleading, or that any reliance on Meyer's statements was reasonable." On the first claim, District Judge Cronan explained: "In this case, Newton acknowledges that no formal talent agreement existed between him and Meyer … Rather, Newton alleges that 'Meyer, acting in the course and scope of his actual or apparent authority on behalf of NBCUniversal as its Vice Chairman, agreed to represent Plaintiff as his actual or de facto talent agent to obtain financing and distribution of Newton's films.' … [But] Newton does not allege that Meyer had an explicit or implicit 'power to bind' Newton, 'power to negotiate' on behalf of Newton, 'power to affect any legal relations of' Newton, or 'power to do anything except find and introduce prospect[ive]' investors to Newton."
*****
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and Professor Emeritus of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado Denver. For more info: https://www.stansoocher.com.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.