Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bankruptcy Civil Procedure Litigation

Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Panel Holds Lack of Timely Objection Bars Objection to Homestead Value Exemption

In In re Masingale, the U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit held that in the absence of a timely objection, debtors who claimed a homestead exemption of “100% of FMV” in their residence had a valid exemption claim for the full fair market value of the property.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In a recently published decision, In re Masingale, 644 B.R. 530 (9th Cir. BAP 2022), the U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (the BAP) held that in the absence of a timely objection, debtors who claimed a homestead exemption of “100% of FMV” in their residence had a valid exemption claim for the full fair market value of the property, including post-petition appreciation. The fact that the claimed exemption far exceeded the applicable statutory limit, or that the Chapter 7 trustee never had an opportunity to object, did not change the outcome as the BAP found that the lack of a timely objection barred any challenge to the exemption.

This premium content is locked for The Bankruptcy Strategist subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR BANKRUPTCY LAW PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • All aspects of bankruptcy law are covered
  • Tap into expert guidance from top bankruptcy lawyers

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next