Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cybersecurity Law & StrategyFeaturesCybersecurityE-Discovery

Blazing Saddles or Blazing Trails: e-Discovery vs. Forensic Data Collection — Unraveling the Critical Differences

By Ariyah Mandel
July 01, 2023

In the world of e-discovery, data collection from devices plays a pivotal role in legal matters. However, the technique used for data collection is influenced by numerous factors, including the type of case, the jurisdiction and the adversarial or collaborative nature of the parties involved. Attorneys interested in legal technology, data security and e-discovery must grasp the critical differences between two essential methodologies: e-discovery and digital forensics. This article delves into the contrasting features of these methodologies to help attorneys who engage with legal technology better understand the significance of these differences.

Understanding e-Discovery Data Collection

Electronic discovery refers to the process of identifying, preserving, collecting, reviewing and producing electronically stored information in legal proceedings. It plays a crucial role in legal matters like cybersecurity litigation and regulatory investigations. When collecting data for e-discovery, attorneys must consider several key factors. First, preserving the integrity of the data is vital to ensure its authenticity and admissibility as evidence. Additionally, data must be collected from various sources and formats, including emails, documents, databases and social media platforms. Metadata, which provides crucial information about the data's creation, modification and storage, and maintaining a proper chain of custody are also essential considerations. To achieve these goals, attorneys rely on techniques such as data sampling, keyword searching, remote collection and cloud-based solutions. Furthermore, data culling and filtering techniques help refine the collected data to focus on the most relevant information.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.