Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On May 9, 2023, a Federal Circuit panel consisting of Judges Reyna, Mayer and Cunningham issued a precedential opinion, authored by Judge Cunningham, in Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Mylan Pharm. Inc., Case No. 2021-1981. Patent owner Sanofi appealed from an inter partes review (IPR) Board's decision finding Sanofi's U.S. Patent No. RE47,614 (the "614 Patent") invalid as obvious, arguing that Mylan failed to assert that a prior art reference is analogous to the challenged patent and instead asserted that the reference is analogous to another prior art reference. Slip Op. at 2. The Federal Circuit agreed finding that the analogousness test was not based on the challenged patent and, therefore, Mylan did not meet its burden of establishing obviousness. Id. As a result, the Federal Circuit reversed the Board's decision.
Sanofi's 614 Patent relates to a drug delivery device that can be configured to allow setting of different dose sizes by using a "spring washer" that can exert a force on the cartridge and secure the cartridge against movement. Id. at 2-3. All claims of the 614 Patent require a "spring washer" secured by "at least two fixing elements." Id. at 3.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.