Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinFeaturesCryptocurrencyRegulationWhite Collar Crime

Crypto Winter Leads to Explosion of Regulatory Activity

By Mark Bini, Kaela Dahan and Victoria Jaus
August 01, 2023

Legendary investor Warren Buffet famously said, "only when the tide goes out do you discover who has been swimming naked." In the past year, following the Crypto Winter, there has been an explosion of activity by United States regulators and enforcers. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in particular has made clear that it thinks everyone in the crypto pool is swimming without their trunks. Ironically, while the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have brought a great deal of enforcement actions, they also have loudly disagreed with each other over who has jurisdiction, i.e., which digital assets are securities and which are commodities. Crypto companies, for their part, have complained that it is not clear what digital assets, if any, are securities, and that they have not been given clear regulatory rules of the road.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has paved its own path forward in the crypto space. Judge Rakoff once famously wrote, "to prosecutors of white collar crime, the mail fraud statute is our Stradivarius, our Colt 45, our Louisville Slugger, our Cuisinart — and our true love." Jed S. Rakoff, The Federal Mail Fraud Statute (Part 1), 8 Duq. L. Rev. 771 (1980). Modern day white-collar prosecutors have often relied on mail fraud's cousin, wire fraud, and have used that statute to great effect in the crypto space. By principally relying on the wire fraud statute, federal prosecutors have largely sidestepped the question of whether and which digital assets constitute securities or not.

This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.