Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Agosta v. Abraham, 2023 WL 3742963, AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In co-op sellers' action for a declaration that they are entitled to retain purchaser's deposit, purchaser appealed from Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to sellers. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that purchaser was not entitled to cancel the contract with impunity.
Purchaser contracted to buy the subject co-op apartment for $2.75 million, and paid a deposit of $275,000 into escrow. The contract called for a closing on or about July 1, 2022. The contract also included a provision entitled "Seller's inability" which gave the seller' the right to adjourn the closing if seller were unable to transfer the shares and provided that if seller did not elect to adjourn or if on the adjourned ate seller was still unable to perform, either party had the right to cancel the contract, and seller's liability would be limited to refunding the deposit. After the contract was signed, purchaser failed to submit her application for board approval until after the due date, and, after submitting the application, cancelled her board interview. At that point, purchaser purported to cancel the contract and withdrew her application to the co-op board. Seller then brought this declaratory judgment action, and Supreme Court granted summary judgment to seller, holding that purchaser was not entitled to return of her deposit. Purchaser appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
To gauge the level of risk and uncover potential gaps, compliance and privacy leaders should collaborate to consider how often they are monitoring third parties, what intelligence they are gathering with and about their partners and vendors, and whether their risk management practices have been diminished due to cost and resource constraints.