Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cybersecurity Law & StrategyFeaturesClass ActionsCryptocurrencyDispute ResolutionTechnology Media and Telecom

Data Breach Defense: Mobilizing Against Weaponized Mass Arbitration

By Daniella Main and Brooke Bolender
September 01, 2023

Most companies have experienced or will experience a data breach. Increasingly, companies also face the risks associated with mass arbitration weaponized by the overwhelming volume of claims after a breach. This article explores:

  • Mass arbitration's emergence as a class action alternative in data breach cases;
  • The risks and liabilities associated with mass arbitrations;
  • The limited options for mounting an effective response to mass arbitrations;
  • The ways companies can minimize their mass arbitration exposure; and
  • Mass arbitration settlement strategies in data breach cases.

Prevalence of Arbitration Clauses and the Rise of Mass Arbitrations

Arbitration can provide an effective and efficient means of resolving disputes for all parties involved. The prospect of efficient, out-of-court resolution has prompted many companies to insert a binding arbitration clause in most of their consumer contracts. Following the Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, companies have included consumer-friendly and conscionable arbitration provisions that require the company to pay any arbitration filing fees regardless of which party initiates the arbitration. These arbitrations usually come packaged with class action and jury trial waivers.

The widespread use of consumer arbitration clauses, coupled with the liberal federal policy favoring arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act, has drawn the ire of many plaintiffs' attorneys, who are effectively blocked from pursuing many consumer actions or class actions in court. Another subset of the plaintiffs' bar, however, has sought to leverage these arbitration clauses into quick settlements. Enter the mass arbitration.

This premium content is locked for Cybersecurity Law & Strategy subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.