Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Enhanced Oversight of Search Warrants and Title III Wiretaps
Prosecutors and federal agents are entrusted with broad and largely unchecked authority to conduct most aspects of their investigations. For example, they serve grand jury subpoenas that compel the production of evidence and witness testimony. They can conduct physical surveillance of subjects and even introduce undercover agents and confidential informants to them in order to build prosecutions. All of this can be done without any judicial approval. However, two of the most potent investigative tools that prosecutors and agents use to build their investigations — the search warrant and the Title III wiretap — do require judicial approval under the Fourth Amendment. As some commentators (including one of the authors of this article) have observed, search warrants and wiretaps were once used primarily to investigate organized crime, drug dealing and terrorism. In recent years, however, prosecutors have employed these tools increasingly in the context of white-collar crime to the point where it is now commonplace. See, Robert H. Hotz, Jr. & Harry Sandick, "Search Warrants in White-Collar Crime Cases," The Review of Securities and Commodities Regulation, Vol. 45 No. 12 (June 20, 2012).
The warrant requirement is grounded in the fact that it is a serious intrusion on privacy when the government either makes a physical trespass on private property or records someone's private telephone conversations. Under the Constitution, the government may take these steps only if a neutral magistrate concludes that probable cause exists to believe that these steps will uncover evidence of criminal activity. While the warrant requirement is a crucial protection for all Americans, there are limits to the utility of the safeguard of judicial approval. As we discuss in this article, there are steps that the courts and Congress can take to strengthen these safeguards and thereby protect both the accused and those who are never even charged with a crime.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.