Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), the trademark examining attorneys and administrative judges of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) are tasked with reviewing trademark applications to ensure that they are in good form and that the applied-for mark is eligible for federal trademark registration. Examiners and judges are guided in their review by several policies including the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §1051 et seq., the federal statute governing trademark law in the United States and the USPTO's trademark rules of practice and trademark manual of examining procedure or TMEP, among others.
The TMEP is a publicly available document that serves as an excellent resource for actual and potential trademark applicants, registrants and their attorneys. It is accessible online and easily searchable. The TMEP incorporates the Lanham Act and identifies all important application details, including what must be included in an original or renewal application, who is entitled to register a mark and whether they must be represented by an attorney, and what kind of mark is eligible for federal trademark registration versus what kind of mark is prohibited.
Yet, there are still a large number of applications that the examiners and judges must reject because the application does not conform to one or more conditions set forth in the Lanham Act or TMEP. While some of these rejections are considered informalities and usually easily overcome, such as a missing state of incorporation or an overbroad identification of goods, other rejections are substantive and more difficult to navigate.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?