Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Jangle Vision, LLC v. Alexander Wang, Inc., No. 22-55642 (9th Cir. Oct. 26, 2023), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the dismissal of copyright infringement claims, based on a lack of substantial similarity.
Alexander Wang, the fashion giant known for its urban-inspired designs and use of black, was sued by Jangle Vision, LLC, an art collection founded by Claudia Diroma. Diroma claimed that Alexander Wang copied Jangle's "Jangle Vision Twins" artwork. As outlined in Jangle Vision's complaint, Diroma reportedly submitted various works, including the "Jangle Vision Twins," to Wang in hopes of employment. Wang allegedly showed great interest in the "Jangle Vision Twins," which depicts "two highly stylized, imaginary female figures distinguished by unnaturally shaped bodies in colored skins revealing only eyes, nose, and mouth." After submitting her portfolio, Diroma heard nothing back from Wang about a potential job. A few weeks later, however, she saw that the fashion company launched a social media campaign that depicted "tall, thin figures in skintight, solid-colored bodysuits with mask covering their faces and head."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.