Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Like Mushrooms After A Rainstorm: Trade Secret Cases, and Lawyers, Are Growing Exponentially
When I started practicing law over 30 years ago — as hard as it is for many people to believe now — patent litigation was not "the thing" it is today. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which is the court that hears all appeals in patent cases, was then only four years old. Patent "trolls," as such, did not yet exist, although "submarine" patents did (Lemelson's being the most well known). Some of the most famous patent owner friendly courts (e.g., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas) had yet to emerge, and there were virtually no local patent rules. On the business side of the law, most firms in "Big Law" did not have a single patent attorney in the firm (and if they did, they had just one or two), and even those that did often did not handle patent cases. Thirty years later, this seems unthinkable.
There were also numerous unanswered legal questions, such as whether claim construction was a fact or legal question, which was not settled until the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Markman v. Westview Instruments, 517 U.S. 370 (1996). Methods for calculating damages in patent cases were uncertain — today, all patent litigators are familiar with concepts such as "apportionment" and the "entire market value" rule. In many cases, it is inappropriate to apply a royalty on the entire value of an item being sold. Instead, the royalty base should be limited to the portion of the value derived from the use of the patent invention. And of course there is the whole evolution of what inventions are considered "patent eligible" under Section 101 of the Patent Act — a standard which has been (and to some degree remains) a moving target over the last 30 years.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.