Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
To determine whether there is “substantial similarity” between contesting works in copyright infringement cases, federal courts within the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit use a two-step analysis: first an “extrinsic” test based on objective criteria that includes testimony from experts; followed by a subjective, non-expert “intrinsic” test from the perspective of an “ordinary reasonable observer.” District courts typically use only the extrinsic test on motions to dismiss the pleadings in order to spot any objective similarities between works in dispute.
Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.
By Stan Soocher
To the public, a band typically is defined as its performing members, not a business entity that may control the music group. But when it comes to royalty rights, are the performers or the business entity entitled to “featured artist” statutory royalties from digital transmissions of the band’s sound recordings?
Major Labels File Lawsuits Over AI Companies’ Alleged Copying of ‘World’s Most Popular’ Recordings
By Jane Wester
Major record labels including Capitol Records and Sony Music Entertainment sued two music-focused generative artificial intelligence companies, accusing them of “willful copyright infringement on an almost unimaginable scale.”
Hope for ‘Spotify Model’ for Licensing Content for AI
By Mason Lawlor
A “Spotify model” of licensing, regulation and royalties could be the answer to the recent slew of lawsuits and future litigation relating to generative artificial intelligence defined by rampant misappropriation of name, image and likeness of individuals, including high-profile celebrities.
By Entertainment Law & Finance Staff
Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.