Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Let's consider a familiar fact pattern: a global ecommerce retailer, Plate Co, experiences a data incident as a result of a successful phishing attempt by a bad actor. The bad actor is able to access a server containing over 20 years of customer data. The incident is publicized on the dark web, which results in millions of customer data sets being made public, with a note that it was taken from Plate Co. As the company begins to investigate the incident, they realize that no one in the company knew that the data sat on the server that was accessed by the bad actor. The purchase history for some customers is from 2004, and includes credit card numbers and mailing addresses. The company expands its assessment of its systems and finds that they have been retaining other data, including email and the data for former employees, going back many years and have not been implementing any retention or disposal on that data. Concerned about the results of its investigation, and a potential FTC inquiry, the company decides that it must start to minimize its retention of data across the company. The company is also involved in a number of litigations and regulatory investigations that require it to preserve relevant data, including data going back several years. The company knows that it must take action, but is unsure where or how to start. In the meantime, the status quo persists and the data retained by the company continues to compound.
In today's data landscape, the above scenario is not the exception to the rule. Many organizations — from growing start-ups to mature, well-established companies — are struggling with the new reality of what it means to manage data in an era of digital transformation, exponential data growth, and expanding regulatory regimes focusing on data management and minimization.
In short, data minimization matters to regulators, lawmakers and consumers. That means it must matter to companies as well. Data subject access requests and consumer requests to dispose of their personal data are on the rise. The only way to adequately comply with these requests — or to justify non-deletion — is to clearly identify where the data is stored, designate how long that data will be stored, act on the disposal of data in compliance with that storage period and any additional legal obligations, and be able to quickly, concisely and accurately explain the company's position to consumers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.