Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the past, when up-and-coming young lawyers and lateral candidates were invited or recruited to join a law partnership, they often gave little thought to whether the required capital contribution was a good investment. Partners made a lot of money. The rising stars wanted in. Most of the time they assumed that accepting responsibility for the firm's debts, obligations, and liabilities — even signing personal guarantees — would be a good idea.
Today, at most big firms, these assumptions are likely correct. But at small and midsized law firms, this is not always the case. Senior associates, non-equity partners and lateral candidates are well aware of the spectacular implosions of storied firms, and the disasters that followed for their capital partners (including, even at large firms, clawbacks by bankruptcy trustees from partners who had resigned years before). Many want to know whether the firm is well-positioned financially to grow and prosper when the current generation of senior partners retires. To get the information they need to value an investment in the firm, they turn to its finance professional (such as its CFO, Controller, or other financial manager).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.