Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the past, when up-and-coming young lawyers and lateral candidates were invited or recruited to join a law partnership, they often gave little thought to whether the required capital contribution was a good investment. Partners made a lot of money. The rising stars wanted in. Most of the time they assumed that accepting responsibility for the firm's debts, obligations, and liabilities — even signing personal guarantees — would be a good idea.
Today, at most big firms, these assumptions are likely correct. But at small and midsized law firms, this is not always the case. Senior associates, non-equity partners and lateral candidates are well aware of the spectacular implosions of storied firms, and the disasters that followed for their capital partners (including, even at large firms, clawbacks by bankruptcy trustees from partners who had resigned years before). Many want to know whether the firm is well-positioned financially to grow and prosper when the current generation of senior partners retires. To get the information they need to value an investment in the firm, they turn to its finance professional (such as its CFO, Controller, or other financial manager).
A law firm's chief finance professional is its repository of all things financial. This executive should be ready to answer three important due diligence questions from prospective new partners about succession:
These are "canary in the coalmine" questions. If the finance chief cannot produce satisfactory responses, it may be time to tell firm management that inadequate succession planning is inhibiting the firm's ability to attract new partners — and therefore inhibiting growth.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.