Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Chapter 11 bankruptcy has long been thought of as anathema to commercial real estate (CRE) lenders. This is due to the debtor-friendly bankruptcy forum, particularly with respect to (i) the up to 18 month exclusivity period during which only the debtor could propose a plan of reorganization and (ii) threats of a "cram-down" plan used to lever concessions from lenders. These provisions can be, and often were, abused by debtors with no real rehabilitative intent using bankruptcy only as a leverage tool. These abuses led to changes in the bankruptcy code (for example, reducing modifying deadlines in single-asset real estate bankruptcies) and also to widespread use of non-recourse carve-out guaranties that would make the sponsor guarantor fully liable for the loan if any party acting on behalf of the special purpose borrower entity files or acquiesces to a bankruptcy proceeding. These events also established a principle in CRE lending that is seldom questioned almost 30 years later: bankruptcy is to be avoided.
But for single-asset commercial properties in jurisdictions with high real estate transfer taxes, prepackaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy may offer an attractive option compared to those typically available to lenders, such as foreclosure, a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, or a short sale.
The foremost advantage of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy lies in its exemption from transfer taxes for properties conveyed under a confirmed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. In jurisdictions such as New York City, where state and local transfer taxes combine to reach 3.025%, and Los Angeles, which has recently adopted a "mansion" tax applicable even to commercial property sales over $5 million, these taxes can amount to millions of dollars upon property relinquishment or disposition. Furthermore, "pre-packs" can move relatively swiftly through courts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.