Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
[Editor's Note: June's issue of The IP Strategist included an article on the need for a trade secret protection plan now that noncompete clauses have been made unenforceable. This article looks at one part of such a plan — patents.]
On May 7, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) published a final rule banning the enforcement of nearly all noncompete clauses in employment agreements nationwide (89 FR 38342). This new rule will have sweeping effects across all sectors of the economy, if it survives court challenges that have already been filed (see, e.g., Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. FTC, 6:24-cv-00148 (E.D. Tex., April 24, 2024).
|The FTC's new rule makes it an unfair method of competition to enter into new noncompete clauses or enforce existing noncompete clauses after Sept. 4, 2024 (120 days after publication of the rule in the Federal Register), with very limited exceptions: existing noncompete clauses with senior executives can remain in force, though new ones are not allowed, allowing for a sunset period; and noncompete agreements tied to the sale of a business entity can remain valid. Causes of action for breach of a noncompete agreement accruing prior to the Sept. 4 deadline can still be enforced, and the FTC does not consider it an unfair method of competition to attempt to enforce a noncompete where there's a good-faith, though erroneous, basis to believe the rule is inapplicable (such as disagreements over whether an employee qualifies as a "senior executive," which is defined in the rule as a worker earning a salary of at least $151,164, placing them in the top 15th percentile nationally; and who is in a "policy-making position," typically an officer of a corporation or with similar authority).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.