Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Under the doctrine of merger by deed, certain terms, covenants and conditions of a contract for the sale of real property are merged with and into the deed to the property upon delivery. Based on the common law doctrine of caveat emptor, merger by deed provides a sense of finality to the transaction process. Since a deed is a subsequent writing between the parties, there is some logic to the terms of the deed taking precedence over the terms of the prior contract of sale, at least as to the subject matter of the deed.
Taken to an extreme, the merger doctrine mandates that prior agreements made between buyer and seller are superseded by the terms of the deed, so that the deed (along with other agreements delivered at closing) stands alone as the sole source of legally enforceable obligations between buyer and seller. Most sophisticated contracts of sale contain representations, warranties and covenants that are far broader than the subject matter of a deed, though, so the doctrine of merger by deed can result in unintended consequences.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.