Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IRS Seeks to Regulate Partnership Basis Adjustments
In many simple cases, a partner's tax basis in their partnership interest (so-called "outside basis") will equal his pro rata share of the partnership's tax basis in its assets (so-called "inside basis"). However, there are various transactions that may cause a disparity between inside basis and outside basis to occur.
For example, if a person purchases a partnership interest at a valuation that is higher than the partnership's inside basis, the purchaser's outside basis will be greater than his share of the partnership's inside basis.
In such a situation, if the partnership sells an asset and allocates the gain pro rata to its partners, the purchaser would be allocated too much tax gain compared to his economic profit. To ameliorate this result, the tax code allows a partnership to make an election (a so-called "section 754 election") to increase the tax basis of its assets with respect to the purchaser in an amount equal to the difference between the purchaser's outside basis in the partnership and his share of the partnership's inside basis in its assets (a so-called "section 743 adjustment").
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
AI Poisoning: A Self Help Cybersecurity Option
A novel legal self-help technique to secure artificial intelligence data and programs is known as Poisoning AI. This technique involves modifying the AI algorithm to intentionally produce specific erroneous results.
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed the issue of whether purchasing market competitors’ search engine keyword terms, known as “conquesting,” constitutes trademark infringement.
DOJ Issues New Rule Regulating Handling of Bulk Sensitive Personal Data
The DOJ has proposed a rule that would regulate certain transactions involving bulk sensitive personal data. The rule would implement a complex regulatory framework, with civil and criminal enforcement, that is similar to sanctions and export licensing regimes. It also implicates federal cybersecurity requirements, government contracting and CFIUS actions.
Adapting for Success: Strategic Insights for Law Firms in 2025 and Beyond
The legal industry is at an inflection point, grappling with challenges that range from rising client demands to technological disruption. There are five critical areas where firms can take a proactive, strategic approach, including actionable insights and recommendations for navigating 2025 and beyond.
Second Circuit Clarifies Video Privacy Protection Act
The Second Circuit’s decision is notable in that it signals a reversal of the recent trend of dismissals of VPPA claims in courts across the country and could trigger a significant increase in VPPA lawsuits. Although organizations have grappled with VPPA claims for several years, this decision is another red flag to organizations to take immediate steps and ensure compliance with privacy laws to mitigate the risks of VPPA claims.