Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Can a Licensor Receive Royalty Payments Beyond the Life of Patent Protection?

By Matthew Golden
October 01, 2024

An axiom of patent licensing is that a patent owner cannot receive royalty payments for post-expiration use of its patented technology. However, in exercising their rights to freedom of contract, parties to an IP license may desire flexibility in how they structure payments for the underlying licensed IP. For example, the parties may be willing to trade upfront payments and higher royalty rates for an extended life of royalty payments at a lower royalty rate. How do you determine if the ongoing royalty obligations that extend beyond the life of underlying patent protection, even if agreed to by the contracting parties, are enforceable? A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit shows what types of license arrangements pass the test.

The Ares Case

The dispute in Ares Trading SA v. Dyax Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40484, revolves around multiple players involved in a process of drug development, each of whom is trying to get a piece of the ultimate pie:  revenue based on sales of the resulting drug product. In this case, the drug product was an antibody-based cancer therapeutic that was discovered using patented antibody-screening technology owned by Cambridge Antibody Technology (CAT). CAT licensed its patents to companies including Dyax to perform antibody screening in exchange for royalty payments based on the subsequent sale of the developed drug product.

In the transaction at the center of the Ares dispute, Ares had hired Dyax to perform antibody screening for a particular biological target identified by Ares. Ares then developed one of the antibodies Dyax uncovered into the commercial cancer therapeutic. Under its license with CAT, Dyax was required to pay a royalty on any drug product discovered using the CAT-patented technology. Dyax sublicensed its rights under the CAT license to Ares along with its royalty obligation, which required Ares to pay Dyax a royalty for the longer of the life of the CAT patents or 10 years from the first sale of the drug. In this case, Ares did not begin sales of its drug product until 2017, and the CAT patents expired in 2018. Thus, Ares had agreed to pay royalties well beyond the life of the underlying CAT patents.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Top 5 Strategies for Managing the End-of-Year Collections Frenzy Image

End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.

The Self-Service Buyer Is On the Rise Image

Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.

Should Large Law Firms Penalize RTO Rebels or Explore Alternatives? Image

Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.

Sink or Swim: The Evolving State of Law Firm Administrative Support Image

The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?

Tax Treatment of Judgments and Settlements Image

Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.