Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the case of Avion Funding v. GFS Industries (In re GFS Industries), 99 F.4th 223 (5th Cir. 2024), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that corporate debtors that elect to proceed under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 are, pursuant to Section 1192 of the Bankruptcy Code, subject to the discharge exceptions set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code. In so holding, the GFS court agreed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the only other circuit court to address this issue, in the case of Cantwell-Cleary v. Cleary Packaging (In re Cleary Packaging), 36 F.4th 509 (4th Cir. 2022).
In the GFS case, the debtor, GFS Industries LLC, entered into an agreement with Avion Funding LLC. pursuant to which Avion loaned money to GFS. To secure this obligation, Avion obtained a lien on certain of GFS's future receivables. As part of the agreement, GFS represented to Avion that it did not anticipate filing for bankruptcy. However, two weeks after signing the agreement, GFS filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas. In its bankruptcy petition, GFS elected to proceed under Subchapter V of Chapter 11.
Avion filed a complaint against GFS in its bankruptcy case claiming that GFS fraudulently obtained Avion's financing by misrepresenting whether it anticipated filing for bankruptcy. In its complaint, Avion sought a declaration from the bankruptcy court that GFS's debt to Avion was nondischargeable due to these misrepresentations. GFS moved to dismiss Avion's complaint, arguing that the dischargeability exception on which Avion sought relief only applies to individual debtors.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.