Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The shift back to in-office work presents a significant challenge for large law firms that have embraced remote work over the past few years. According to our recent survey, the vast majority of firms already had an RTO policy in place by 2023; however, also at that time, compliance was at an all-time low where firms reported a shocking 94% of their attorneys were not compliant with policy.
In 2024, while many firms are improving these numbers and getting their attorneys back into the office, a small number of attorneys resist, and the question is how to get the resisters to comply with policy. Whether it's because of lease obligations, mentorship, culture, or all of the above, firms have turned up their efforts to get their attorneys back into the office.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.