Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Commercial property insurance is an essential form of protection for any business that owns or leases property. Like most insurance policies, commercial property policies are subject to coverage limits setting forth the maximum amount the insurer(s) are contractually obligated to pay. While in many cases involving a substantial property loss the applicable policy limit is clear, in some cases it is not, and the amount to which the policyholder is entitled is governed by a confluence of policy provisions informed by applicable state law.
For purposes of our discussion, assume a policyholder owns a building that suffered a near-total covered loss. Assume the policyholder holds a commercial property policy insuring multiple separate properties with an aggregate policy limit of $100 million. Finally, assume the damaged building has a "scheduled" value of $10 million based on a schedule of values on file with the insurer, a market value of $15 million, and that repairs necessary to return the building to its pre-loss condition will cost $20 million. Whether the policyholder is entitled to recover $20 million, $15 million, $10 million (or some number in between) depends on the type of policy at issue and the interaction of loss payment (or loss-settlement), valuation and like provisions governing the extent of the insurer's liability. Examples of those policies and provisions are discussed below
|Commercial property policies covering multiple properties usually contain either "blanket" or "scheduled" limits of liability. A blanket limit policy is one with a stated limit that applies on an aggregate basis to any or all locations covered by the policy. These limits are typically much larger than the value of any single property and are reduced by payment of loss to one or more properties, with the balance of the applicable blanket limit available to cover damage to the other properties. Where a property policy provides a blanket limit, absent express language to the contrary, coverage for damage to a particular building is not limited to the amount stated as the building's value even where the policy has or references a schedule of values for each location. In contrast, a policy with true "scheduled" limits is one that contains or references a schedule of insured values for each property and makes expressly clear that the insurer's liability for each scheduled location is limited to the scheduled value for that location.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A novel legal self-help technique to secure artificial intelligence data and programs is known as Poisoning AI. This technique involves modifying the AI algorithm to intentionally produce specific erroneous results.
In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed the issue of whether purchasing market competitors’ search engine keyword terms, known as “conquesting,” constitutes trademark infringement.
The DOJ has proposed a rule that would regulate certain transactions involving bulk sensitive personal data. The rule would implement a complex regulatory framework, with civil and criminal enforcement, that is similar to sanctions and export licensing regimes. It also implicates federal cybersecurity requirements, government contracting and CFIUS actions.
The legal industry is at an inflection point, grappling with challenges that range from rising client demands to technological disruption. There are five critical areas where firms can take a proactive, strategic approach, including actionable insights and recommendations for navigating 2025 and beyond.
The Second Circuit’s decision is notable in that it signals a reversal of the recent trend of dismissals of VPPA claims in courts across the country and could trigger a significant increase in VPPA lawsuits. Although organizations have grappled with VPPA claims for several years, this decision is another red flag to organizations to take immediate steps and ensure compliance with privacy laws to mitigate the risks of VPPA claims.