Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support
Section 337 of the U.S. Tariff Act empowers the International Trade Commission (ITC or Commission) to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, including patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Under the ITC's pleading requirements, a Section 337 complaint filed at the ITC must "[d]escribe specific instances of alleged unlawful importations or sales." 19 CFR §210.12 (a)(3). In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint. In several recent cases, however, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation. This article surveys those decisions and offers advice for parties filing an ITC complaint and those opposing institution of an investigation with respect to importation allegations.
A well-pled ITC complaint should adequately describe specific instances of importation or sales and provide exhibits supporting those allegations. Typically, importation can be readily established by submitting photographs of the accused products purchased in the United States, clearly showing the labels indicating foreign manufacture (e.g., "Made in China"). Receipts and other documents reflecting the purchase of the products in the U.S. should also be included. For certain products, such as semiconductor chips incorporated into electronic devices, a teardown of the device may be necessary to take photographs of the chips hidden inside.
As the ITC's recent decisions reveal, failure to include such evidence in a complaint can lead to a denial of institution.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
MLF BONUS CONTENT: Marketing Predictions and Trends In 2025
Our friends at Edge Marketing are ending the year by sharing their predictions for 2025. From the continued evolution of generative AI and its many uses to an increase in multimedia and hypertargeting, these are some of the key factors that will guide legal marketing strategies in the new year.
CLS BONUS CONTENT: The Shifting E-Discovery Landscape: From Artificial Intelligence to Antitrust
As organizations enhance their e-discovery processes and infrastructure, the expectation to leverage technology to maximize service delivery increases. However, legal professionals must balance innovation with humanity.
Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Corporate Trademark Infringement Remedy Calculation Case
The business-law issue of whether and when a corporate defendant is considered distinct from its affiliated entities emerged on December 11 at the U.S. Supreme Court, with the justices confronting whether a non-defendant’s affiliate’s revenue can be part of a judge’s calculation of the monetary remedy for the corporate defendant’s infringement of a trademark.
Navigating AI Risks: Best Practices for Compliance and Security
The most forward-thinking companies embrace AI with complete confidence because they have created governance programs that serve as guardrails for this incredible new technology. Effective governance ensures AI consistently aligns with an organization’s best interests, safeguarding against potential risks while unlocking its full potential.
What Will 2025 Bring for Legal Tech
It’s time for our annual poll of experts on what they expect 2025 to bring in legal tech, including generative AI (of course), e-discovery, and more.