Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
By Justin R. Donoho
With cyberattacks on the rise and class actions arising from cyberattacks being filed at an increased rate, executives and board members increasingly face the risk of being individually targeted in lawsuits brought by class action plaintiffs and governmental bodies alleging individual liability for data security failures. Typically, such suits allege that the individuals made misrepresentations about their companies’ cybersecurity risks and practices and took or failed to take certain actions in connection with data security incidents.
This article identifies recently emerging trends in such varied but similar lawsuits, including two currently being prosecuted in U.S. district courts, draws common threads, and discusses four best practices that executives and board members should consider to mitigate the risk of individual liability for data security failures: don’t make any alleged misleading statements about cybersecurity risks and practices; don’t conceal cybercrimes or obstruct proceedings; disclose use of website advertising technology; and implement reasonable data security practices.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.