Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Internet Archive has stopped defending its free digital library against a publisher-launched copyright lawsuit and announced that it won’t ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the depository is a fair use of the plaintiff publishers’ copyrights.
The archive said in a blog post that it would honor an agreement with the Association of American Publishers (AAP) and remove copyrighted material from the library at publishers’ requests, instead of fighting a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit requiring the materials removal. See, Hachette Book Group Inc. v. Internet Archive, 115 F.4th 163 (2d Cir. 2024).
Open Libraries is a project by the Internet Archive through which users can borrow full, digital scans of millions of works, including roughly 3.6 million copyrighted ones. Launched in 2011, Open Libraries initially restricted the number of digital copies available for circulation, only to declare a National Emergency Library during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic and lift the curbs.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.