Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Ninth Circuit: Fully Secured, Nonrecourse Creditors Qualify As ‘Countable’ Creditors

By Lawrence J. Kotler and Geoffrey A. Heaton
January 01, 2025

Addressing a matter of first impression, the bankruptcy appellate panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (BAP) recently held that fully secured, nonrecourse creditors qualify as “countable” creditors for purposes of determining the viability of an involuntary bankruptcy petition under Section 303(b) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. See, I, 664 B.R. 162 (9th Cir. BAP 2024). In so doing, the King decision highlights a potential pitfall for creditors who contemplate the filing of an involuntary bankruptcy petition against a putative debtor.

Background


In August 2022, Wolverine Endeavors VIII, LLC filed an involuntary Chapter 7 petition against Carole D. King. Wolverine was the sole petitioning creditor, and asserted a claim in excess of $7 million against King on account of a previously obtained judgment. King, in turn, moved to dismiss the involuntary on the basis that she had at least 12 countable creditors as determined under section 303(b) of the code, and, as a consequence, at least three petitioning creditors were necessary in order for the petition to be viable.

After King filed her dismissal motion, three entities (Insurance Company of the West, Fence Factory, Inc. and East West Bank) filed joinders to the involuntary petition pursuant to Section 303(c) of the code, which allows a creditor meeting certain qualifications to “join in the involuntary petition with the same effect as if such joining creditor were a petitioning creditor.” King contested the qualifications of certain of these entities to join in the petition.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.